Wikifunctions:Requests for deletions
Latest comment: 3 hours ago by Bunnypranav in topic Unneeded function
Functions or implementations or tests which do not work properly, do not meet notability criteria or are duplicates of another object can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions under the "Requests for deletion" section below.
If it is obvious vandalism, just report it in Wikifunctions:Report vandalism, or ping an administrator. Contact can also be made with an administrator on Telegram or IRC #wikipedia-abstract.
If it is a predefined object (its ZID is less than 10000), please see Wikifunctions:Report a technical problem.
 | SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. |
| edit |
 |
|---|
| Archives |
Requests for deletion
(!) xorshift Z13148
Can we delete this one, now that we have Z19460? --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:52, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Ameisenigel: They're for different Types, and the latter is collared. @FenrisAureus created it, and @99of9 added "(!)" presumably to tell people not to use it, both in 2024; perhaps they might have views. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 08:40, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- the implementation of Z19460 is (i believe) of xorshift128 while Z13148 is of xorshift32 and xorshift64. I suggest merging and renaming Z19460's current implementation to eliminate confusion. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 10:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Unneeded function
- Unlabelled (Z42154) and its implementation Unlabelled (Z42155)
superseded by quantity with qualifier from Wikidata (monolingual) (Z42170). --鈴音雨 (talk) 00:43, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
 This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:11, 16 September 2026 (UTC) |