Jump to content

Wikifunctions:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/05

From Wikifunctions


Testcase is duplicate of Moroccan Arabic cardinal, input = 21030 (Z16179) --Ideophagous (talk) 22:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Ameisenigel (talk) 07:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

No idea why we would need this string as a ZID. --Ameisenigel (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Duplicate of JavaScript boolean === (Z10583). --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Duplicate of bitwise xor JavaScript (Z15925). --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Duplicate of Z16451. --Ideophagous (talk) 20:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

I guess we should delete Z16451 instead, Standard Moroccan Tamazight cardinal, input = 10 (Z16448) is slightly older. --Ameisenigel (talk) 08:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 08:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Ameisenigel (talk) 08:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

No idea why we would need this string as a ZID. --Ameisenigel (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

See Special:Search/Z11488.--GZWDer (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
That just redirects me to Z11488. --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Try Special:Search//"Z11488". It looks like deleting this object would break two test cases. GrounderUK (talk) 07:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Interesting, why does this not show up at [1]? --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
I think that’s phab:T361701. GrounderUK (talk) 04:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be possible to have this tests without the ZID by using the string directly? --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
That should always be possible, yes. We don’t have many Z6 objects and these few should all provide a justification, in my opinion. I don’t have a view on what should be considered adequate justification, however. GrounderUK (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
I have changed both tests to use the string directly. --Ameisenigel (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
@Ameisenigel: OK, so this is now ready to delete? Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 15:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes, it is. --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Done. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 18:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Ameisenigel (talk) 07:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)