Wikifunctions:Requests for deletions/Archive/2023/08

From Wikifunctions


Z10626

I created this by mistake, sorry. --Wolverène (talk) 12:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Terasail[✉️] 11:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Võro (Z1346) & Komering (Z1816)

Related to the same natural language. Not quite a deleton request - is it possible to merge one object into another, like in WD? --Wolverène (talk) 08:00, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

It seems like there is no possibility to merge objects. Do we want to create a Phabricator task for this functionality? Despite this I am not sure if the objects are redundant because one has the code flu-vro and the other one has vro (of course they both refer to the same language). --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:49, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
James has fixed Z1346 (adding vro as the main code and moving fiu-vro to the alias list); Z1816 can be deleted on-wiki now. (He has also made a patch to fix it in the schemata, but that won't affect this production site). Thank you for noticing and mentioning it! Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. --Wolverène (talk) 05:52, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Terasail[✉️] 11:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Template:Abstract Wikipedia navbox

Tagged for deletion using {{delete}}, which doesn't exist here. It probably should. Pppery (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Terasail[✉️] 11:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

is palindrome (Z10096)

Does not fall within the scope of supporting Abstract Wikipedia. In addition: SHA-256 (Z10124), SHA-384 (Z10132), are strings anagrams (Z10423), SHA-1 (Z10148), SHA-512 (Z10067), ROT13 (Z10627), ROT25 (Z10851), ROT1 (Z10846), Base64 Encode (Z10057), Base64 Decode (Z10062), Encode NATO phonetic alphabet code (Z10309), and more. 0xDeadbeef (talk) 15:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

I do not think that all functions on Wikifunctions need to be related to Abstract Wikipedia. Abstract Wikipedia is just one possible usecase for functions. Ping @Fnielsen, GZWDer, Ingenuity, Stang, Denny, and Poslovitch: as creators of the mentioned functions. --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Correct. Functions do not need to be related to Abstract Wikipedia. See Wikifunctions:About for some details on the project's envisioned goals. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 06:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Hmm, then how will these functions support the "Wikimedia movement"? See Wikifunctions talk:Notability#What is the purpose of this proposed policy? 0xDeadbeef (talk) 16:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Note that the Mission statement we discussed and proposed for Wikifunctions is: "A Wikimedia project for everyone to collaboratively create and maintain a library of code functions to support the Wikimedia projects and beyond, for everyone to call and re-use in the world's natural and programming languages.”
In this case it would be about the and beyond part, I guess.
Also, personally, I would love to see a function such as is palindrome (Z10096) be actually callable from the Wikipedia article for palindromes. I think that would be another evolutionary step for the encyclopedia. --DVrandecic (WMF) (talk) 23:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Not done There is no consensus for the deletion of these items --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Terasail[✉️] 11:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)