Wikifunctions:Requests for deletions/Archive/2023/08

Z10626

I created this by mistake, sorry. --Wolverène (talk) 12:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Terasail^[✉️] 11:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Võro (Z1346) & Komering (Z1816)

Related to the same natural language. Not quite a deleton request - is it possible to merge one object into another, like in WD? --Wolverène (talk) 08:00, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

It seems like there is no possibility to merge objects. Do we want to create a Phabricator task for this functionality? Despite this I am not sure if the objects are redundant because one has the code flu-vro and the other one has vro (of course they both refer to the same language). --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:49, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

James has fixed Z1346 (adding vro as the main code and moving fiu-vro to the alias list); Z1816 can be deleted on-wiki now. (He has also made a patch to fix it in the schemata, but that won't affect this production site). Thank you for noticing and mentioning it! Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. --Wolverène (talk) 05:52, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Terasail^[✉️] 11:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Template:Abstract Wikipedia navbox

Tagged for deletion using {{delete}}, which doesn't exist here. It probably should. Pppery (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Terasail^[✉️] 11:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

is a palindrome (Z10096)

Does not fall within the scope of supporting Abstract Wikipedia. In addition: SHA-256 (Z10124), SHA-384 (Z10132), are strings anagrams (Z10423), SHA-1 (Z10148), SHA-512 (Z10067), ROT13 (Latin alphabet) (Z10627), ROT25 (Latin alphabet) (Z10851), ROT1 (Latin alphabet) (Z10846), Base64 Encode (Z10057), Base64 Decode (Z10062), Encode NATO phonetic alphabet code (Z10309), and more. 0xDeadbeef (talk) 15:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

I do not think that all functions on Wikifunctions need to be related to Abstract Wikipedia. Abstract Wikipedia is just one possible usecase for functions. Ping @Fnielsen, GZWDer, Ingenuity, Stang, Denny, and Poslovitch: as creators of the mentioned functions. --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Correct. Functions do not need to be related to Abstract Wikipedia. See Wikifunctions:About for some details on the project's envisioned goals. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 06:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Hmm, then how will these functions support the "Wikimedia movement"? See Wikifunctions talk:Notability#What is the purpose of this proposed policy? 0xDeadbeef (talk) 16:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Note that the Mission statement we discussed and proposed for Wikifunctions is: "A Wikimedia project for everyone to collaboratively create and maintain a library of code functions to support the Wikimedia projects and beyond, for everyone to call and re-use in the world's natural and programming languages.”

In this case it would be about the and beyond part, I guess.

Also, personally, I would love to see a function such as is a palindrome (Z10096) be actually callable from the Wikipedia article for palindromes. I think that would be another evolutionary step for the encyclopedia. --DVrandecic (WMF) (talk) 23:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Not done There is no consensus for the deletion of these items --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Terasail^[✉️] 11:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)