Wikifunctions talk:Programming languages
Appearance
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Jdforrester (WMF) in topic RIIR
RIIR
Not sure which section to mention it in but
— Arlo Barnes (talk) 06:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Arlo Barnes: I don't understand? The task you've linked is about the service, not the user-written code languages. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 14:07, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Apologies, my intention wasn't to confuse; I left the link to the task at this talk page as a sort of to-read for later because I didn't feel I myself understood the arrangement enough to mention it on the project namespace page. I observe from the title
[26Q2] Rust evaluator in productionthat the task is about the WF:glossary § evaluator, and I note that the Python and JS code becomes WASM in order to be executed, so I can see that Rust code doesn't directly factor in to evaluating a function. Arlo Barnes (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)- @Arlo Barnes: Yup! We're not against Rust (or other compiled languages), but they're more complicated, and for now we're not adding additional programming languages. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Apologies, my intention wasn't to confuse; I left the link to the task at this talk page as a sort of to-read for later because I didn't feel I myself understood the arrangement enough to mention it on the project namespace page. I observe from the title