Jump to content

Wikifunctions talk:Main Page/Archive/2025/02

From Wikifunctions
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Mdktb in topic Overflow boxes

Overflow boxes

Hi, I think there is a style rule or more that makes boxes flow out of parent elements (opposite direction of writing) when the screen width becomes less than 768px. The problem is more obvious in RTL languages. Maybe this rule, when disabled or changed to max-width the problem goes away, or maybe another one (I didn't check it carefully) --Mdktb (talk) 12:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

I think adding box-sizing: border-box; with this rule, also set padding: 0; here will fix it --Mdktb (talk) 05:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Overflow boxes

{{Edit request}}

Hi, I think there is a style rule or more that makes boxes flow out of parent elements (opposite direction of writing) when the screen width becomes less than 768px. The problem is more obvious in RTL languages. Maybe this rule, when disabled or changed to max-width the problem goes away, or maybe another one (I didn't check it carefully) --Mdktb (talk) 12:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

I think adding box-sizing: border-box; with this rule, also set padding: 0; here will fix it --Mdktb (talk) 05:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Mdaniels5757, sorry to mention you, can you "please" check this out? if you visit the main page and choose RTL lang. then reduce the window width size the content boxes will overflow out to the left, thx in advance --Mdktb (talk) 03:20, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
@Mdktb Done, hopefully that helps? Let me know! —Mdaniels5757 (talk  contribs) 16:38, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Mdaniels5757, thx, but box-sizing: border-box; should be in class .mainpage_box to work, and padding: 0; is important for the mobile version so that the boxes do not become small, it is better to take the full width. It's less overflow now, but not perfect to be honest --Mdktb (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Maybe padding: 0 0.5rem; would be a good compromise --Mdktb (talk) 17:14, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
@Mdktb Sorry, is Special:Diff/173459 better? —Mdaniels5757 (talk  contribs) 19:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757, yes, thank you --Mdktb (talk) 23:39, 13 March 2025 (UTC)