Wikifunctions:Requests for deletions/Archive/2025/09

Z27992

It's a duplicate of Z10862. Dv103 (talk) 21:39, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

And Z27996 is a duplicate of Z12663. Dv103 (talk) 08:20, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Done both. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:26, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:26, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Z27993

Z27993 is a duplicate of Z10018 and Z27998 is a duplicate of Z10021 Dv103 (talk) 08:17, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Done —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Z21803

Near duplicate of Z22696 Dv103 (talk) 16:52, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Done ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 03:30, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 03:30, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Z20806

Duplicate of Z28154. Z20897 and Z20807 should be deleted too. Dv103 (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Done ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

@Dv103: Shouldn't the older ones be kept and your newer versions deleted, in general? Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 16:42, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

The older version used a wrong model to represent error: it expected just a string representing the error in natural language, mainly in English. The newer version instead correctly throws a coustom error, and requires the ZID and the string arguments of the error as parameters. Dv103 (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

@Dv103: Understood! Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 14:02, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Z28188

Duplicate Dv103 (talk) 06:35, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Done sorry I should have done it your way the first time! --99of9 (talk) 06:40, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ameisenigel (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Z23295

Obsolete Python implementation. The code was moved to a helper function (Z28219), and the parent function (Z23293) now uses a composition (Z28221). This old implementation is no longer used. Aram (talk) 13:14, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Done ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:33, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:33, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Z28383 and its tests

I request deletion of the following function and tests:

• Z28383
• Z28384
• Z28431
• Z28430
• Z28429

Reason: I decided to adopt a different approach, which has resulted in Z28432 (which should not be deleted). Thanks! DMartin (WMF) (talk) 01:21, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

In Z28432 I don't understand why you supply the item as well as the statement. The statement already specifies the item as its subject. So the sentence could be generated from a statement alone? 99of9 (talk) 03:31, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

I did that for one reason, an optimization – to avoid having to fetch the item again unnecessarily. I expect/assume the item has already been fetched by the calling function (so that it could choose the statement of interest). The item is still needed, to get its label in the requested language. If it's not passed through as a separate argument, the implementation of Z28432 would be forced to fetch it again. (The statement, of course, merely carries a reference to the item, not the full item.) DMartin (WMF) (talk) 02:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 05:06, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

@DMartin (WMF): FYI --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Ameisenigel (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2025 (UTC)